Legal Opinion

Pollack v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1934PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinions were filed March 6, 1934:

Rosenberry, C. J.

1. Defendants assign as error the refusal of the trial court to grant separate trials, and allege such refusal was an abuse of discretion. The defendants conspired with Peters; they, pursuant to the conspiracy with Peters; acted jointly in the commission of the crime to assault with intent to rob. To a point in time at least to within a few seconds of the time when Police Officer Zingler was killed, they continued to act in concert. They therefore should not complain if upon consideration the court denies them separate trials.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Emery v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. People v. . BeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. NutleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. LindellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. CydzikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API