Legal Opinion
Slater Steels Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 21, 2003No. Consol. 02-00551PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARZILAY, Judge.
I. Introduction
This is a consolidated case. 1 Plaintiffs and Defendants-Intervenor Slater Steels Corporation, Carpenter Technology Corporation, Electralloy Corporation, and Cruei- ble Specialty Metals Division of Crucible Materials Corporation (hereinafter “domestic industry” or “Plaintiffs”) challenge the final results of an administrative review of an antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from India undertaken by the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“Commerce”). See Stainless Steel Bar from India; Final Results of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Fort Stewart Schools v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Viraj Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Carpenter Technology Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- China Kingdom Import & Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Slater Steels Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Former Employees of International Business MacHines Corp. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.