Legal Opinion
Slater Steels Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 8, 2004No. Consol. 02-00551PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARZILAY, Judge.
I. Introduction
The United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “government”) timely filed the Final Results of Redeter-mination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Remand Results”), pursuant to the remand order of the court in Slater Steels Corporation v. United States, 27 CIT -, 279 F.Supp.2d 1370 (2003) (“Slater I”), the familiarity with which is presumed. The sole issue in this consolidated action (as it was in Slater I) is Commerce’s “collapsing” of three companies of the Viraj Group, an Indian competitor, pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 351.401(f) (2000)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Mullins Coal Co. of Va. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carpenter Technology Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Viraj Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Chia Far Indus. Factory Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Carpenter Technology Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Carpenter Technology Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.