Legal Opinion

United States v. Douglas

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided June 2, 1993No. 3:92-cr-00141PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING FIRST MOTION TO SET CONDITIONS OF RELEASE

MEANS, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is defendant Clarence William Boston’s First Motion to Set Conditions of Release Subsequent to Entry of his Plea of Guilty,-which was filed in the above-styled and numbered cause on May 24, 1993. In the motion, Defendant requests that he be released pending sentence. After careful consideration of the motion, the Court finds that it should be and is hereby DENIED.

Defendant was charged with twenty-three other individuals with participating in a cocaine trafficking conspiracy in the Fort Worth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Efren Herrera-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. BloomerDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1992
  3. United States v. TaliaferroDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. MahabirDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
  2. United States v. LippoldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. United States v. GreenDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
  4. United States v. YannottiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. United States v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API