Legal Opinion
United States v. Lippold
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 1, 2001No. S1 99 CR 1110 RWSPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Mark Lippold (“Lippold”) appeals the decision to remand him pending sentencing. The government opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied.
Background
On April 12, 2001, a jury convicted Lip-pold of participating in a conspiracy to distribute and possess with intention to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. After hearing additional arguments on the quantity of narcotics involved the next morning, the jury returned a second verdict reflecting its determination that Lippold knew, or that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Joseph DisommaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Samantha Carr, Darlene Hunter, and Joseph RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. BloomerDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. GreenDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
- United States v. John LeaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. YannottiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- United States v. KaquatoshDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- United States v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.