State v. Davis
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
I
At the outset, it should be noted that we are in agreement with that portion of the decision of the Court of Appeals holding that the appellant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment was not violated.
In Barker v. Wingo, supra (407 U. S. 514), the United States Supreme Court found no infringement of a defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights, where he had not been brought to trial for more than five years after his arrest. The facts in that case indicated that the delay occurred as a result of a series of continuances secured by the prosecution, which were not objected…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. PudlockOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. CrossOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. GrayOhio Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. McBreenOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. RameyOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. JamesOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. McRaeOhio Supreme Court · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.