Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1976No. 75-902PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

I

At the outset, it should be noted that we are in agreement with that portion of the decision of the Court of Appeals holding that the appellant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment was not violated.

In Barker v. Wingo, supra (407 U. S. 514), the United States Supreme Court found no infringement of a defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights, where he had not been brought to trial for more than five years after his arrest. The facts in that case indicated that the delay occurred as a result of a series of continuances secured by the prosecution, which were not objected…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. PudlockOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. CrossOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. GrayOhio Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. McBreenOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. RameyOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. JamesOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. McRaeOhio Supreme Court · 1978

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API