Legal Opinion

Pepper v. Selig Chemical Industries

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 26, 1982No. 62670PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

Jean Pepper was injured while using a chemical solution designed for use in the process of tinting optical lenses. Some of the solution spilled pnto a hot plate, caught fire and burned Pepper. She sued Selig Chemical Industries (Selig), the manufacturer or distributor of the product, Robertson Optical Laboratories, Inc. (Robertson), and R. O. L. Lens Co. (R.O.L.), the sellers of the product, for negligence in the manufacturing of an inherently dangerous product and for failure to warn of the dangers in using the product. Selig’s motion for summary judgment was granted, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Center Chemical Co. v. ParziniSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Talley v. City Tank Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Harrison v. TuggleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  4. Beam v. Omark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. General Motors Corp. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Butz v. WernerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Powell v. Harsco Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Ogletree v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Boyce v. Gregory Poole Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. English v. Crenshaw Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API