Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Tuggle
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 20, 1969No. 25099, 25100PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Justice.
The trial court correctly struck the “second defense” filed by the defendants. The effect of such plea was to allege a “catchall” zoning classification which would be applicable to the plaintiffs’ property if the “single family residential R-85” zoning was declared void. The “catchall” classification quoted in the pleadings is by its terms applicable only where an area of the county is not shown on the zoning map of the county and would have no application to an area shown on the zoning map but zoned in an arbitrary and unreasonable manner so as to be void.
A motion for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ginn v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Hunter v. A-1 Bonding Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Word v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Dickson v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Layfield v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Anderson v. CrippenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Savannah Valley Production Credit Ass'n v. CheekSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- FPI Atlanta, L.P. v. SeatonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.