Legal Opinion

Powell v. Harsco Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1993No. A93A0198PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

George E. Powell was drowned when the fiberglass grate catwalk upon which he was standing collapsed and he was thrown into a vat of chemicals at a paper mill operated by his employer, Ponderosa Georgia Corporation. His widow, Rose E. Powell, brought this wrong ful death and survival action against appellee Harsco Corporation. It is a form of products liability litigation. After discovery, Harsco moved for summary judgment, urging among other things, that it had no duty of care, that it had complied with any applicable duty of care, and also the absence of legal causation. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Talley v. City Tank Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Union Carbide Corp. v. HoltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. JC Lewis Motor Co. Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Ogletree v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Cobb Heating & Air Conditioning Co. v. Hertron Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jack v. Glaxo Wellcome, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002
  2. Roskop Dairy v. GEA Farm Tech.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Pruette v. Phoebe Putney Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. McQuaig v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API