Legal Opinion

Beam v. Omark Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 8, 1977No. 54027PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

This is a products liability case arising out of injuries sustained by the appellant-plaintiff, due to the misfiring of an alleged defective "stud gun,” manufactured by defendant Omark Industries, Inc., and locally distributed by defendant Builders Equipment Company, Inc. Both defendants moved for and were granted summary judgment. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse. Held:

1. A "stud gun” is a firearm which uses a "power load” (a percussion cap with gunpowder) to propel a "fastner” (either a stud or a nail) into a steel or concrete wall. This gun will cause a nail to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  3. Center Chemical Co. v. ParziniSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Ginn v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  5. Everhart v. Rich's, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., and Third-Party v. Kay-See Dental Manufacturing Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. StubblefieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Huggins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,997 Katie Laurel Wells v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Giordano v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API