Shawnee Fire Insurance v. Cosgrove
Supreme Court of Kansas
OPINION ON REHEARING. Appeal from Johnson district court.
1Opinion of the Court
*375The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
In the second paragraph of the syllabus in the opinion on the former hearing of this case (Insurance Co. v. Cosgrove, 85 Kan. 296, 116 Pac. 819) it was said that, on conditions therein specified, “it is the duty of the insurer to intervene in the action and protect his own interests.”
This was said not with reference to an imperative legal duty but with reference to the interest of the insurer and the insured. In other words, that when a party has a clear right and opportunity to protect his own interests he has no moral right to lie quiescent…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shawnee Fire Insurance v. CosgroveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
3Cited by25 opinions
- Nitchals v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Gibbs v. Hawaiian Eugenia Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Gibbs M. Smith, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- Washtenaw Mutual Fire Insurance v. BuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Farmers Insurance v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.