Legal Opinion

Graybeal v. Martin Sand & Gravel

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 31, 2007No. 104,057PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOUG GABBARD, II, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Defendant Martin Sand & Gravel appeals the granting of a new trial, following a defendant’s verdict, on the grounds that the jury received extraneous information that the plaintiff had received an insurance settlement. Plaintiff Forrest Ralph Graybeal, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ruby Eileen Graybeal, counter-appeals the denial of a requested jury instruction and a motion for a directed verdict. We affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2 On the dreary, misty afternoon of April 2, 2005, Defendant’s 10-wheel dumptruek veered across the center line of a Marshall…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Computer Publications, Inc. v. WeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Mueggenborg v. WallingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Capshaw v. Gulf Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ledbetter v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Ledbetter v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API