Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Swift & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 13, 1937No. 1 Div. 954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

The bill in this cause was filed by James A. Bishop and Ida Bishop, husband and wife, to enjoin foreclosure of a mortgage executed by them to appellee, Swift & Co., for redemption of the property, and, incidentally, the allowance of a set-off against the mortgage indebtedness.

The demand sought to be set off consisted of certain claimed damages, alleged to have been sustained by the said James A. Bishop, growing out of the breach of a contract he had with appellee for the purchase of fertilizer, and to secure the purchase price of which the mortgage in question was given. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thomas v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Hodges v. SublettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Caldwell v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. McCaleb v. WorcesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Kelly v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. De Moville v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Rumage v. Dry Dock Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API