Legal Opinion
De Moville v. Merchants & Farmers Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 19, 1939No. 2 Div. 122PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is a second appeal in the case. See 233 Ala. 204, 170 So. 756, for the facts as presented on that appeal.
The court there held that the foreclosure by the bank of a certain mortgage there described embracing real and personal property was irregular, and vacated it and declared the existence of the equity of redemption rather than the statutory right of redemption.
On remand, the trial court undertook to observe the mandate of this Court and ordered a reference to the register to state the account and ascertain the amount due on the mortgage. There was a reference and…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Carter v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Barrington v. BarringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Ex parte State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Mewburn's Heirs v. BassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Woodmen of the World v. AlfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- New York Times Company v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Jones v. CaseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Frank Nelson, Jr. And Lee Etta Nelson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Ex Parte CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Sparks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.