Legal Opinion

Tarner v. Chambersburg Borough School District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 1940No. Appeal, 41PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Linn,

In the quo warranto proceeding, reported as Com. ex rel. Tarner v. Bitner, 294 Pa. 549, 144 A. 733, it was decided that Tamer, who is the plaintiff in the present case, held title to the office of tax collector for the borough of Chambersburg for the year 1928. For that year, Bitner, who was the defendant in the quo warranto and who was held not entitled to the office, collected $134,-803.66 school taxes and retained $3,370.09 as tax collector’s compensation. Thereafter, Tarner, contending that the right to receive the compensation was inherent in his office,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. FriedrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. BitnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Jones v. DusmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Marshall v. Uniontown Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. County of Cumberland v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Local No. 163, International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink & Distillery Workers v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Reed v. SloanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Rachael v. Forest Hills School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Reed v. SloanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. In re West Salem Township's Auditors' Report, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API