Marshall v. Uniontown Borough School District
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 152, Jan. T., 1917, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Fayette Co., Dec. T., 1915, No. 207, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of J. Searight Marshall v. The School District of the Borough of Uniontown. Assumpsit for commissions on taxes, collected by a de facto collector.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 152, Jan. T., 1917, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Fayette Co., Dec. T., 1915, No. 207, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of J. Searight Marshall v. The School District of the Borough of Uniontown. Assumpsit for commissions on taxes, collected by a de facto collector. Before Reppert, J. From the record it appeared that at the election held Nov. 4, 1913, Charles T. Cramer and J. Searight Marshall were opposing candidates for the office of tax collector in the Borough of Uniontown, Fayette County, this State. The election officers returned an apparent majority for Cramer and…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Plaintiff was entitled to: the affirmance of his point asking that a verdict be directed in his favor: Rink v. Philadelphia, 15 W. N. C. 345; Jones v. Dusman, 246 Pa. 513. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jones v. DusmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
3Cited by10 opinions
- Erie City v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Reed v. SloanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Tarner v. Chambersburg Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- House v. Allegheny CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- McNulty v. Throop Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.