Hombra v. Smith
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKiNNey
The primary purpose of the bill is to determine the title to two tracts of land, covered by water, referred to as “Big” and “Little Ronaldson” Sloughs, the two embracing about 800' acres; and, incidentally, to enjoin a condemnation suit pending* in the circuit court until the question of title is decreed.
_ It is alleged in the bill that complainants, for many years, have owned and been in possession of a boundary of land adjacent to Reelfoot Lake, containing 2287 acres; that defendants, commissioners, pursuant to chapter 18, Acts of 1925, have instituted condemnation proceedings in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Faulkner v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Dixon v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zirkle v. City of KingstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- State ex rel. Moulton v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
- Mississippi State Highway Commission v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- Chumbley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- Georgia Industrial Realty Co. v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.