Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mandatory Bussing v. Brooks

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1972No. 41912PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeill, J.

Petitioners filed recall charges in King County against all seven members of the Seattle School Board. Defendants, King County election officials, refused to issue ballot synopses on the ground that the charges are not legally sufficient to support recall. Petitioners thereupon commenced this action for a writ of mandamus compelling issuance of the ballot synopses. In response, defendants assert the legal insufficiency of the charges and, as an- affirmative defense, that issuance of the requested synopses *123in the present circumstances would amount to “state action” violative of the equal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Reitman v. MulkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. North Carolina State Board of Education v. SwannSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. DeFunis v. OdegaardWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In re the Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Cole v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API