Legal Opinion
South Euclid Fraternal Order of Police v. D'Amico
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 8, 1982No. 43845PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
This appeal arises from the judgment of the court of common pleas declaring South Euclid Ordinance 49-80 invalid.
On March 12, 1981 appellees, as members of unions representing police and fire department employees, brought a declaratory judgment action to contest the validity of Ordinance 49-80 (hereinafter the Ordinance). Further, appellees requested a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. The challenged Ordinance amended sections of the city’s ordinances which set forth guidelines and directives for the use of sick leave benefits for city employees.
Appellees filed a brief…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ronald G. Davis v. R. F. ZahradnickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Dale v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Harvey B. Johnson v. Rac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Paul Plante v. Troy C. Shivar, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
3Cited by14 opinions
- Universal Coach, Inc. v. New York City Transit Authority, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Petrey v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Pyle v. Ledex, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Reese RefrigerationOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Dearth v. Stanley, 22180 (2-8-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.