Legal Opinion
In the Interest of M.C.M.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 21, 2001No. 01-00-00888-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHNEIDER, Chief Justice.
The appellants, Gregory Matney (“Father”) and Marla Matney (“Mother”), appeal from an order terminating their parent-child relationships. We affirm.
Background
Appellants are the adoptive parents of two sons, M.C.M. and J.D.M.1, and two daughters, C.M.M. and J.L.M. Mother is the biological mother of another, daughter born during the marriage, L.S.M. Although not the biological father of L.S.M., Father never disputed paternity. The biological father of L.S.M. is unknown.
On March 12, 1998, the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (“the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Wiley v. SpratlanTexas Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- In the Interest of J.M.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Birnbaum v. Law Offices of G. David Westfall, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- Kniatt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
- Samuel Espinoza Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- In the Interest of A.K.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.