Legal Opinion
Adams v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 7, 1984No. 80CA1226PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
In this action for breach of fiduciary duty, defendants, Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., a corporation, and Lawrence Ocrant (collectively “broker”), appeal a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, Caryl Adams (customer), individually and as trustee of the V.M. Johnson 1962 Trust. We affirm.
Customer filed this action alleging broker had breached fiduciary duties owed to her, and had negligently inflicted emotional distress on her because of outrageous conduct. Customer sought compensatory damages for losses suffered because of excessive trading and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harding Glass Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Hecht v. Harris, Upham & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1968
- Charles Hughes & Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Stevens v. Abbott, Proctor & PaineDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Glenn Hill v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Incorporated, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Rupert v. Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. Louis, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.