Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mast v. Doctor's Hospital North

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1976No. 76-56Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStern, J.

I agree that the cause be remanded. However, I am of the opinion that, in remanding the cause, it should be retried on all issues, on the basis of Markota v. East Ohio Gas Co. (1951), 154 Ohio St. 546, and Edelstein v. Kidwell (1942), 139 Ohio St. 595.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Markota v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Edelstein v. KidwellOhio Supreme Court · 1942