Legal Opinion
Ward-Chandler Building Co. v. Caldwell
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 12, 1935No. Civ. 9283, 9405PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDS, J., pro tem.
Appeals are presented from two orders of the superior court, one authorizing and the other confirming the sale of a trademark by a receiver.
Florence Hudgen and Owen Hudgen at one time conducted a beauty parlor and permanent hair waving salon under the name of “Hudgens Permanent Wave Shop”. It is not disputed that this name was recorded in the office of the secretary of state as a trademark. (Pol. Code, secs. 3196, 3197.) Thereafter the Hudgens sold the business, including the trademark, to the defendant Mildred J. Caldwell, who later sold both to the defendant Rae…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- The Children's Bootery v. SutkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Falk v. . American West Indies Trading Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- In re Jaysee Corset Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1911
- Reid v. St. JohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by13 opinions
- Estate of Presley v. RussenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Larry Marshak v. "Doc" Green, John Doe "1", John Doe "2", Bernard Jones, David Rick, and Sandy Wolfe, David RickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Boice v. StevensonArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Jackman v. MauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Balesteri v. HollerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.