Legal Opinion

Lane Bryant, Inc. v. Maternity Lane, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1949No. 11940PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit-Judge:

Lane Bryant, Inc., a Delaware corporation, filed an action in -the district court, against Maternity Lane Ltd.,-of California, a California corporation, and Jack, junior, Jane and Lucille Lane, and John Doe One and Two alleging acts by them to the injury of plaintiff as summed up in a paragraph of the complaint which we quote:

“The acts of defendants which are complained of herein were done in violation, of plaintiff's exclusive right to-its trademark ‘Lane Bryant’ lised .in connection. with plaintiff’s sale of maternity apparel, and with a fraudulent and unlawful…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Polk Co. v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Helene Marceau Sidebotham v. W. L. Robison, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Sidebotham, Deceased, and Robert Sidebotham and James SidebothamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Frank I. RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. NATIONAL DISTILLERS AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API