Hollopeter v. Rogers
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a change of venue.
The defendant, while in custody in Marin County, signed a written contract with the plaintiffs whereby he retained them as his attorneys and agreed to pay them certain sums as their fees. One of the plaintiffs has his offices in Los Angeles County and the other has his offices in the City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiffs brought their suit in Marin County to recover a claimed balance due under the contract. The complaint was not verified but alleged that the written contract between the parties was entered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Armstrong v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Sheeley v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Meadows v. Emett & ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- White v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Archer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962