Legal Opinion
Hongke Zhang v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 9, 2004No. 03-70930PublishedCited by 170 opinions
1Per curiam
Hongke Zhang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of withholding of removal and protection under Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture (“Convention Against Torture” or “Convention”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). Because the BIA affirmed the IJ’s decision without opinion, we review the IJ’s decision as the final agency determination. Khup v. Ashcroft, 376 F.3d 898, 902 (9th Cir.2004).
Zhang contends that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Baltazar Hernandez Barron Margarita Hernandez Ramirez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Shpetim Hoxha v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Baljinder Singh SANGHA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- Aden v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Chun Gao v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Rajinder Singh v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Toufighi v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Omari v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.