Central Housing Inv. Corp. v. Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'n
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DE CONCINI, Justice.
The sole question on this appeal is whether evaporative house coolers placed on mortgaged property subsequent to the execution of the mortgage are subject to the mortgage on foreclosure.
The facts are undisputed, hence there is only a question of law to decide.
In 1947 the Del Webb Construction Company built 700 houses as a post-war housing project known as Pueblo Gardens, south of Tucson, Arizona. The construction company built the houses but the ownership of the land and the improvements was in other corporations owned by the Del Webb interests. The construction was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tyson v. TysonArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Forsythe v. PaschalArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Covington v. Basich Bros. Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Denver Joint Stock Land Bank v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Berne v. StevensMontana Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Pima County v. HeinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Brady v. Black Mountain Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Brisco v. Meritplan InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Application of DenetclawArizona Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.