Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1924No. 3983PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONAHUE, Circuit Judge.

The Food and Drug Act of 1906 and the amendments of 1912 (Comp. St. § 8724) do not confer, and do not purport to confer, admiralty jurisdiction upon the United States District Courts, in proceedings to condemn property seized under the provisions of that act and amendments thereto. The provision that a libel shall be filed and the proceedings shall conform as near as may be to the proceedings in admiralty, relate only to procedure and not to jurisdiction. Pour Hundred and Forty-Three Cans of Frozen Egg Product v. U. S., 226 U. S. 172, 33 S. Ct. 50, 57 L. Ed. 174, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Four Hundred & Forty-Three Cans of Frozen Egg Product v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Bullock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  3. Atlantic Ice & Coal Corp. v. VanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Research Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. United States v. Nutrition Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. United States v. ONE DEVICE, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  5. Bristol-Myers Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API