Legal Opinion
United States v. ONE DEVICE, ETC.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 27, 1947No. 3374, 3375PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
The government has appealed from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Utah denying its prayer for the seizure and condemnation of two certain devices, each bearing a plate reading “Tox-Eliminator Tox Eliminator Co. Inc., Glendale, Calif. Ser. No. 513,” and for the seizure of certain circulars which accompanied the devices. The devices are identical, differing only as to the number of the name plate attached thereto. The action was instituted under the Federal Food and Drug Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. Trial was to the court, and judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels, More or Less, Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar, Douglas Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bratt v. Western Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. TalgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- United States v. Armature Rewinding Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. WhitescarverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Purcell v. ZimbelmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- V. E. Irons, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
- Dolcin Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Sandra Lee Hickok, A/K/A Sandra Leigh Hickok v. G. D. Searle & Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Eleonora Sitta, Administratrix of the Estate of Pasquale Vitucci, Deceased v. American Steel and Wire Division of United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.