Legal Opinion

Research Laboratories, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1948No. 11624PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.

In four cases consolidated for trial, judgments and decrees were entered condemning and ordering destroyed quantities of a proprietary drug known as “Nue-Ovo” and certain written material alleged to constitute'the labeling thereof. The action of the court below was taken pursuant to libels alleging misbranding, under 21 U.S.C.A. § 352(a). From the judgments and orders referred to, the present appeals have been taken by the intervenor below, as claimant of the property seized.

The appellant, an Oregon corporation, has engaged in the manufacture, sale, and distribution of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Donaldson v. Read Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Pasadena Research Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. United States v. El-O-Pathic Pharmacy United States v. Hudson Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. United States v. Allan Drug Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  5. Carter Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API