Legal Opinion

State v. Oxner

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 24, 2011No. 26915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones

Respondent was convicted in magistrate’s court of preparing a baited dove field in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 50-1-10 (2008) and appealed to circuit court. After a hearing, the circuit court judge issued a written order requiring that respondent’s conviction be “reversed and dismissed” based upon her sua sponte conclusion that the magistrate’s court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the charge. The State did not challenge that order in the circuit court but instead brought this appeal. We affirm the circuit court’s dismissal as the State has failed to preserve any issue related to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. RoweSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. City of Rock Hill v. SuchenskiSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  3. United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  4. DeTREVILLE v. GROOVERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Dunlap & Dunlap v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Sloan v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. State v. HaygoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  4. Sloan v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. OxnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API