Berry v. Maywood Mutual Water Co. Number One
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Plaintiff sued to recover $2,150, alleged to be the reasonable value of legal services performed for defendant Maywood Mutual Water Company Number One, a corporation. The trial court found that plaintiff had rendered services for defendant under oral contracts by which he was to be paid a monthly retainer fee of $50, and, after September 12, 1934, an additional fee of $50 for each day spent in court, and that all sums due plaintiff had been paid. The plaintiff admits receipt of payments totaling $1875, but contends that they did not cover the services which are the subject of the present…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Pacific Bank v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Scott v. Superior Sunset Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Raymond v. GloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pellett v. Sonotone Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Gaillard v. Natomas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Hernandez v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- SEE-TEE MINING CORPORATION v. National Sales, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.