Legal Opinion

Henry v. Rouse

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1956No. Docket 27, Calendar 46,483PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiffs, Charles Henry and Florence Henry, his wife, instituted a suit in the circuit court of Oakland county in chancery to enjoin the disposing of $1,000 paid by them to James R. Rouse and Emma L. Rouse, his wife, and to determine the ownership of the amount involved. The record shows that on April 12, 1952, plaintiffs and defendants, James R. Rouse and Emma L. Rouse, his wife, entered into an agreement to purchase a parcel of real estate owned by the Rouses. The agreement contained the following:

“If the abstract or owner’s title insurance policy shall disclose the title to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Czeizler v. RadkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. StowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. Zurcher v. HerveatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Dassance v. NienhuisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Brotman v. RoelofsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Kieffer v. Van LeeuwenMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API