GEICO Insurance v. Bernheim
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Defendants, Nancy and Thomas Bernheim, appeal the trial court’s summary judgment decision granting plaintiff GEICO Insurance Company’s claim against them for reimbursement of $10,000 that GEICO had paid defendants under the medical-payments provision of their automobile insurance policy. Although we agree with the trial court that defendants must reimburse GEICO, we reverse and remand for a determination of the proper reimbursement amount.
¶ 2. The facts related to this appeal are not in dispute and can be summarized as follows. Defendants were, at the time of the events leading to this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Hamilton Fire Insurance v. GregerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Illinois Automobile Insurance Exchange v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- National Union Fire Insurance Company v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Stamato v. QuazzoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smiley v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- GEICO Insurance Co. v. BernheimSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Mooers v. Middlebury CollegeDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2021
- Smiley v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015