Legal Opinion
Feeley v. Allstate Insurance
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 17, 2005No. 04-191PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Defendant Allstate Insurance Company appeals from a Franklin Superior Court judgment on plaintiff Randal Feele/s claim for underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits following a work-related motor vehicle accident. At issue in Allstate’s appeal is whether Feeley’s UIM policy allows Allstate to deduct the amount of workers’ compensation benefits Feeley received pursuant to New York law from the UIM proceeds due under his personal policy with Allstate. The trial court entered judgment against Allstate on Feeley’s claim, and we now affirm.
¶ 2. Feeley is a Vermont resident who was working for a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Robertson v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Connolly v. Royal Globe InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Sanders v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. SurdamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hubbard v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Progressive Casuality Insurance Co. v. MMG Insurnace Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Hubbard v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTYSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Humphrey v. Vermont Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Travelers Insurance Company v. John Henry v. Co-Operative Insurance Companies, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.