Legal Opinion
Manley v. Ticor Title Insurance
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1991No. CV-90-0293-PRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Ticor Title Insurance Company of California (Ticor) petitioned us to review an opinion of the court of appeals, claiming that the court improperly expanded the duties of an escrow agent and created obligations not previously imposed by law. See Manley v. Ticor Title Ins. Co., 165 Ariz. 318, 798 P.2d 1327 (Ct.App.1989). We granted review (see Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S.) and consolidated this case for argument with two others also involving Ticor and similar real estate transactions. Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co., 168 Ariz. 345, 813 P.2d 710…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Marine Midland Bank v. John E. Russo Produce Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re the Estate of MillimanArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Herdan v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grant Thornton LLP v. Prospect High Income FundTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Cortez v. Avalon Care Center Tucson, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- 10k LLC v. Wvsv HoldingsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.