Legal Opinion
Harry and David v. Workmen's Compensation Bd.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 21, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Plaintiff brought a declaratory judgment proceeding under ORS ch 28 against the Workmen’s Compensation Board to determine the validity of a rule promulgated by the Board, and appeals from an adverse determination.
On April 16, 1968, claimant-employe was hired by plaintiff corporation. He was blind in one eye, which was unknown to plaintiff but obviously known to himself. Two days later, in an on-the-job accident, claimant lost the sight in his other eye, thus becoming permanently and totally disabled as defined in ORS 656.206 (l)(a). Plaintiff applied for benefits from the Second Injury…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Western Seed Production Corp. v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Van Ripper v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- School District No. 1 Ex Rel. Lynch Co. v. Rushlight & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Claim of Belluci v. Tip Top Farms, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SallingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Crouse v. Workmen's Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- D & M Products, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. SallingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972