Legal Opinion
Boucouvalas v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 4, 1939No. 3010PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.
The facts recited above disclose a situation parallel to the one considered by this court in the case of Bilodeau v. Insurance Co., 84 N. H. 405, and the plaintiff contends that he is entitled to judgment under the rule announced in that case. The defendant admits that the facts in the case last cited and in the one at bar are substantially similar, but contends that this court adopted an erroneous view of the law not only in the Bilodeau case but also in the case of Domocaris v. Insurance Co., 81 N. H. 177, upon which it is based, and urges that we now overrule both of those decisions.
In the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Continental Life Insurance v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Insurance Company v. MahoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Allen v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Invest Almaz v. Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Olszak v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Leclerc v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. GruetteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Griffiths v. Certain UnderwritersDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.