Legal Opinion
Invest Almaz v. Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 16, 2001No. 00-1340PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Invest Almaz appeals from adverse rulings of the district court regarding claims arising out of a failed attempt to purchase manufacturing equipment from defendant-appellee Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation (“Temple-Inland”). Invest Almaz contends that the district court abused its discretion by failing to order restitution of funds retained by Temple-Inland after the deal collapsed and by erroneously granting Temple-Inland’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on Invest Almaz’s fraud claims. Invest Almaz also contends that the jury was not…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hodgens v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Simion Stepanischen v. Merchants Despatch Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Katz v. City Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Sidney Morse v. R. Clayton McWhorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States Ex Rel. Rost v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Ruiz-Rosa v. Rivera-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Mann v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Guilloty-Perez v. Fuentes AgostiniCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.