Legal Opinion

Leclerc v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 8, 1944No. 3493PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurque, J.

The case is on all fours with Boucouvalas v. Insurance Co., 90 N. H. 175, and is controlled by it. Here, as in that case, the applications were attached to and made part of the policies. Together they constituted the entire contract. The applications contained false answers as regards the condition of insured’s health, and previous treatment. He stated he was in good health, never had had heart trouble, and never had been treated by a doctor, while in fact he had rheumatic heart trouble for a number of years, and had been attended by various physicians.

Plaintiff’s position is that those facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brookhouse v. Union Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  2. Boucouvalas v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  3. Warren v. HayesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
  4. Knox v. PerkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  5. Perry v. HardySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Invest Almaz v. Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. University System of New Hampshire v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Manchester Manufacturing Acquisitions, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
  4. Batchelder v. Northern Fire Lites, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1986
  5. Leavitt v. StanleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API