Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 5, 1978No. Civ. A. N-74-637PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHROP, Chief Judge.

This action was filed on behalf of the Secretary of Labor on June 19, 1974. In the complaint, the Department of Labor (Department) charged the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company (B & O) and the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company (C & O) with violating Section 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, (29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.). Counsel for both plaintiff and defendant railroads have submitted the following issues to this Court for resolution:(1) Whether the Department satisfied the conciliation requirement of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act prior…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
  4. Greene v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Thor C. LAUGESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ANACONDA COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Criswell v. Western Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Sikora v. American Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  4. Marshall v. American Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
  5. William C. SEXTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BEATRICE FOODS CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API