Lang v. Lilley & Thurston Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in the opinion reported ante, p. 223.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The question for solution on this appeal by plaintiff involves the legal integrity of the ruling of the lower court sustaining the demurrer of defendants, the Mahony Bros., to plaintiff’s second amended complaint. In an opinion rendered by this court and filed the twenty-third day of the present month and reported ante, p. 223, [128 Pac. 1028], the order of the lower court sustaining the demurrer of The Lilley & Thurston Company was upheld, and to that decision reference is made for a fuller exposition of plaintiff’s pleading. The demurrer of respondents herein, which was both general and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Glaser v. RothschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kennedy v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Cary v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- South v. County of San BenitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919