Legal Opinion

Harvlie v. Jack Post Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 2008No. Docket 276044PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter returns to this Court on remand from our Supreme Court for consideration as on leave granted. 477 Mich 1017 (2007). Defendant employer and its insurer appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission (WCAC), which affirmed with modifications 1 an order of the magistrate. The magistrate ordered (1) reimbursement for all reasonable expenses incurred by plaintiffs care providers from September through November 2003; (2) reimbursement for their mileage and attendant care; (3) reimbursement to Blue Cross Blue Shield (Blue Cross); (4) an attorney fee in an amount…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Lash v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Gose v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Radina v. Wieland Sales, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API