State v. Diaz

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Daniel Diaz was convicted of one count of possession of a dangerous drug for sale (methamphetamine. weighing more than nine grams) and sentenced to an aggravated term of twenty-five years’ imprisonment. On appeal, he argues the trial court erred in not suppressing statements he made after what he contends was an illegal arrest and in sentencing him pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-604 rather than A.R.S. § 13-712. 1 For the reasons stated below, we affirm his conviction but remand to the trial court for resentencing.

Factual and…