Legal Opinion
Shaw v. Russell Trucking Line, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 30, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-1852PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANSMANN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Motions to Dismiss and Motions to Strike filed by Defendants Russell Trucking Line, Inc. (hereinafter “Russell Trucking”) and Medusa Cement (hereinafter “Medusa”). Plaintiff, John L. Shaw, Jr., brought this action as a result of his discharge by his employer, Russell Trucking. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss are denied in part and granted in part, and their Motions to Strike are denied.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The facts of this case, accepting the averments of the Complaint as stating the facts, 1 may…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Darlington v. General ElectricSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Palmer v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- M.U. ex rel. Urban v. Downingtown High School EastDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Karen Lee Woodson v. Amf Leisureland Centers, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.