Legal Opinion

Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Reily

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 17, 1963No. 24PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court 1

373 U.S. 64 (1963)

HALLIBURTON OIL WELL CEMENTING CO.

v.

REILY, COLLECTOR OF REVENUE OF LOUISIANA.

No. 24.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 26-27, 1962.

Restored to calendar for reargument April 2, 1962.

Reargued December 3, 1962.

Decided May 13, 1963.

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.

Benjamin B. Taylor, Jr. reargued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Robert O. Brown, C. Vernon Porter, Robert E. Rice, Laurance W. Brooks, Frank W. Middleton, Jr. and Tom F. Phillips.

Chapman L. Sanford reargued the cause and filed a brief for appellee. With him on a motion to…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Warren; Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Dean Milk Co. v. City of MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. v. OwenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API