Jaques v. Manton
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
I
{¶ 1} The common-law collateral-source rule generally prevents the admission of evidence in a tort action showing payments made to benefit the plaintiff from any source other than the tortfeasor. The General Assembly largely abrogated the common-law rule by enacting R.C. 2315.20. This case asks us to determine the effect of R.C. 2315.20 on our holding in Robinson v. Bates, 112 Ohio St.3d 17, 2006-Ohio-6362, 857 N.E.2d 1195, that the amount accepted by a medical provider as full payment for treatment of the plaintiff is admissible in a personal-injury action, even when that amount is less…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robinson v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. LoweOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Wagner v. McDanielsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Wood v. ElzohearyOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Jean Dedmon v. Debbie SteelmanTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- Moretz v. MuakkassaOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- Lang v. Beachwood Pointe Care Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Coburn v. Auto-Owners InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.