Legal Opinion

Jaques v. Manton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2010No. 2009-0820PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

I

{¶ 1} The common-law collateral-source rule generally prevents the admission of evidence in a tort action showing payments made to benefit the plaintiff from any source other than the tortfeasor. The General Assembly largely abrogated the common-law rule by enacting R.C. 2315.20. This case asks us to determine the effect of R.C. 2315.20 on our holding in Robinson v. Bates, 112 Ohio St.3d 17, 2006-Ohio-6362, 857 N.E.2d 1195, that the amount accepted by a medical provider as full payment for treatment of the plaintiff is admissible in a personal-injury action, even when that amount is less…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. LoweOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Wagner v. McDanielsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Wood v. ElzohearyOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Jean Dedmon v. Debbie SteelmanTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Moretz v. MuakkassaOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Lang v. Beachwood Pointe Care Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Coburn v. Auto-Owners InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API