Wagner v. McDaniels
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
This appeal presents two issues for our consideration. The first issue is whether the record contains sufficient evidence to establish the reasonableness and necessity of appellants’ expenses. The second is whether evidence of appellee’s net worth was required before he could be assessed with punitive damages.
The court of appeals relied on DeTunno v. Shull (1957), 166 Ohio St. 365 [2 O.O.2d 281], to support its conclusion that appellants had not demonstrated the reasonableness of their expenses. DeTunno held as follows:
“Ordinarily a jury may not consider as items of damage the amounts of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rinaldi v. AaronSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Hotel Riviera, Inc. v. ShortNevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Hanley v. LundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3Cited by41 opinions
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lunsford v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Robinson v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Amber McCombs v. Meijer, Inc., D/B/A Meijer's SupermarketsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Darcars Motors of Silver Spring, Inc. v. BorzymCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.