Legal Opinion

United States v. Laudermilt

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 3, 2012No. 11-4624PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge SHEDD wrote the opinion, in which Judge KEENAN and Judge FLOYD joined.

OPINION

SHEDD, Circuit Judge:

A federal grand jury indicted Jordan Laudermilt on one count of possession of a firearm after a felony conviction, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a). Laudermilt moved before trial to suppress the firearm, arguing that the police seized it in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The district court agreed, and the Government noted a timely appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 3731. Because the police officers’ actions in this case complied with…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Prentiss WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Reshod EverettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  3. United States v. Hernandez-MiesesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2012
  5. United States v. LechliterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API