Legal Opinion
Champagnie v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 30, 2025No. 3:25-cv-01019Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DJION CHAMPAGNIE, Petitioner, No. 3:25-cv-1019 (SRU) v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RULING ON MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE On June 24, 2025, Dijon Champagnie (“Champagnie” or “the petitioner”), proceeding pro se, filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, challenging the legality of the sentence imposed on him. Doc. No. 1. For the following reasons, Champagnie’s motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On August 31, 2021 a grand jury returned an indictment charging Champagnie with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Danilo HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Gomez-PerezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. YanceyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Gordon MorganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.